The Hospice e-News

What the Media Said about End-of-Life Care This Week

Week of October 3, 2006

…a service of Florida Hospices and Palliative Care

 


 

NEW REPORT CARD ISSUED ON STATE PAIN POLICIES

 

The newest edition of Achieving Balance in State Pain Policy:  A Progress Report Card (Second Edition) says, “Forty-one states and the District of Columbia have above average grades for their public policies that influence the management of pain.”  In spite of the steady progress, a joint press release of participating organizations says, “There are still states with policies that prevent healthcare professionals from effectively alleviating the suffering of their patients.”  The report and its companion, Achieving Balance in Federal and State Pain Policy:  A Guide to Evaluation (Third Edition), are available on the website of the American Alliance of Cancer Pain Initiatives at www.aacpi.wisc.edu or at the Wisconsin Pain & Policies Studies Group website at www.painpolicy.wisc.edu. 

 

Evaluations of state policies were made earlier, in 2000 and 2003, and the current results show continued improvement.  No state received a grade of A in 2003 but both Michigan and Virginia did this year.  In 2000, almost half the states had a grade of A or B.  That figure rose to 67% in 2003 and 82% this year.  No state’s grade went down in the six-year period.  Since 2003, 19 states have improved grades.

 

Aaron Gilson, PhD, associate director of US policy research at the Pain & Policies Study Group, says, “We’re seeing positive results, because healthcare regulators have adopted policies encouraging pain management, palliative care, and end-of-life care.  Additionally, many state legislatures have repealed restrictive or ambiguous policy language that has prevented healthcare professionals from aggressively treating pain.” 

 

John R. Seffin, PhD, American Cancer Society CEO, said, “The results of PPSG's research show a very encouraging improvement in state pain policies, but more needs to be done to effectively address the national health crisis of undertreated pain.  States must effectively inform the medical community about improved pain policies so people with pain can benefit from them.  Patients, health organizations, healthcare professionals, regulatory officials, licensing boards, and policymakers all have a role to play to promote a balanced approach to pain control policy and practice.”

 

(AACPI Website; Joint Press Release by PPSG, The American Cancer Society, LiveStrong, and The Susan B. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, 9/27)

 


WITHDRAWING LIFE-SUSTAINING SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN

 

In “Terminal Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Supplemental Oxygen,” in a recent JAMA, Doctors Scott D. Halpern and John Hansen-Flaschen say that a case can be made for supplemental oxygen being a life-sustaining therapy “for spontaneously breathing patients in whom pulmonary gas exchange is so impaired that the needs of vital organs cannot be met with ambient air alone.”  New technologies and increasing numbers of patients with cardiopulmonary disease mean that more patients are being sustained with supplemental oxygen. 

 

The authors say, “Informed patients with decision-making capacity have well-established rights to forgo any and all forms of life-sustaining therapy.  Although these rights clearly extend to supplemental oxygen, requests to remove this form of life-sustaining therapy raise difficult questions.”  Some physicians may wonder whether they should help patients remove the oxygen if the expected result of such action is death.  Or, if oxygen is removed, should it be replaced with palliative sedation?  If palliative sedation is desirable, should distress be anticipated and the sedation be administered before the oxygen is discontinued, or only afterwards if there is obvious discomfort?  The article says, “These and other concerns may prevent some physicians from heeding requests for the withdrawal of life-sustaining oxygen as readily as they may heed requests that other therapies be withdrawn”

 

Balancing the benefits and burdens of supplemental oxygen is one concern addressed by the authors.  Supplying high-flow oxygen has gotten much easier with newer equipment and, in spite of some inconvenience, “Oxygen is less burdensome than many other forms of life support.”  Among its benefits are the alleviation of dyspnea, sustained cognitive function in patients who have severe hypoxemia when resting.  However, the possibility of pulmonary oxygen toxicity exists. 

 

Physicians may also be concerned about being accused of neglect if oxygen is discontinued.  In some cases, the decision is made to continue oxygen by a face mask or nasal cannula, thereby offering some comfort to family and friends, even though the patient may be sedated or even unresponsive.

 

Another concern is whether a patient asking to have oxygen removed is competent to make that choice.  “Many illnesses for which oxygen is used are accompanied by acute impairments of cognitive function due to sleeplessness, hypercarbia, hypoxemia, or the administration or accumulation of sedating drugs.”  Additionally, the article says, if the patient has difficulty communicating because of rapid breathing or dyspnea, it may be difficult to test the patient’s capacity for decision-making.

 

The authors write that giving the patient opioids and benzodiazepines after withdrawing mechanical ventilators does not appear to influence the time until death in ICU patients.  They say that giving such drugs “could easily hasten death among spontaneously breathing patients who are only marginally able to sustain adequate ventilation.”  The doctrine of double effect – outcomes that would be ethically wrong if done intentionally are acceptable if they are the unintentional byproducts of another action not intended to harm – may apply in such situations.  The Supreme Court accepts it as such, but even physicians who also do so “may be unsure about how to administer sedatives and analgesics in this situation.  It is unclear what physiological changes occur after abrupt replacement of high-flow oxygen with ambient air, how patients experience these changes, and at what pace they occur.”  The difficulties are compounded when the patient is at home rather than in the hospital.

 

The article suggests a four-step approach to decision-making, but note that physicians may not be able to overcome all their concerns.

*  Physicians should assure everyone involved – patient, family, caregivers, other healthcare personnel - that oxygen is a life-sustaining medical treatment.  Requests for discontinuing it “should be honored with the same judiciousness as requests to withdraw other forms of life support.”

*  Physicians should also assure themselves that the patient is not influenced in the request by family members, treatable depression or other circumstances such as economic concerns  All other sources of distress should be addressed and it may be helpful to obtain the services of a physician who uses new technology for high-flow oxygen.

*  Physicians must be sure that the patient is mentally capable of making the request.  Such requests should be made on at least two different occasions and the patient should demonstrate knowledge of alternatives and consequences.  The patient should be able to explain why the request is being made.

*  Physicians should make sure that patient, family and caregivers understand that it is very difficult to predict a particular patient’s experience after oxygen is withdrawn.  The patient may become unconscious or may show increased anxiety, distress and agitation.  It should be also be made clear that if drugs are needed for anxiety or distress, it is difficult to know how much to give – too little and the patient may not get relief, or too much and oversedation may result.

 

Withdrawal of supplemental oxygen is easier in a medical facility, but some patients may request that it be done at home.  The authors suggest that a hospice nurse or physician participate, as they can provide “more skilled assessment, titrated dosing of medications, comfort to others who are present, and appropriate documentation of this legitimate medical service.”

 

In conclusion, the authors write, “Regardless of whether supplemental oxygen is withdrawn in a hospital or at home, physicians should explain that the patient’s major recourse in the event of uncontrolled distress is to reapply their oxygen.  The plan can then be reconsidered in light of the experience gained.  False starts and ambivalence have been described in the context of withdrawing dialysis and also may occur after withdrawal of supplemental oxygen.”  (JAMA, 2006;296:1397-1400)

 

 

NURSING SHORTAGE NOTES

 

*  To address Michigan’s nursing shortage, Detroit’s St. John Health and Henry Ford Health Systems are exploring ways to retrain auto workers as healthcare workers.  Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Community College may offer a program that allows students to earn associate degrees in nursing in just 16 months instead of the normal 24, while St. John and Oakland University have a new program designed especially for students who already have bachelor’s degrees in other areas.  .  (Detroit Free Press, 9/20)

 

*  Carondelet Health Network and Mercy Health System of Janesville, Wisconsin, along with large retail chains such as Home Depot and CVS Pharmacy, offer “snowbird” employment to their northern employees who want to spend the cold months of the winter in sunnier climates.  Carondelet’s program is five years old, and about 100 nurses, or 10% of its staff, participates.  An AARP spokesman says that Carondelet and Mercy are the only two companies on AARP’s “Best Employers for Workers Over 50” list who have snowbird programs but expects half the companies on the list to have such programs within five years.  (Time, 9/25)

 

*  There is not only a shortage of nurses, but of all healthcare personnel, an article in the San Bernardino County Sun says.  Michael Wiechart, of LifePoint Hospitals, says, “It’s the perfect storm – a declining labor pool when the needs are increasing.”  In Riverside, the problems are even more intense, because the area is one of the fastest-growing in the country.  The Press Enterprise says that healthcare, public safety and local government leaders will have to work together to come up with solutions.  The American Association of Family Physicians says that Florida, Nevada, Arizona, Texas and Idaho will have critical shortages of physicians by 2020.  (San Bernardino County Sun, 9/25; The Press Enterprise, 9/25; AP, 9/27; The Houston Chronicle, 9/28)

 

 

PUBLIC POLICY NOTES

 

*  On October 19, HNN reported on a Washington Post article which said that DEA had revised its prescription painkiller rule to allow physicians to write multiple prescriptions as long as only one had the current date and the others were future dated.  A press release from the DEA and other media reports clarify that the reported revision is a proposal and that the public may comment on the proposed revision before November 6.  Check the “What’s New” section, as of September 6, of the DEA website at www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/new.htm.  (DEA Website)

 

*  Effective October 15, Leslie Norwalk, a member of the senior leadership team at CMS for the past five years, has been named the acting director of CMS as Mark McClellan steps down.  Mike Leavitt, HHS secretary, says, “She is a nationally recognized expert on Medicare issues and played a central role in the successful implementation of the prescription drug benefit and other reforms to Medicare and Medicaid.”  Norwalk could serve for several months, or even years, until a permanent successor to McClellan is nominated and approved.  (AP, 9/25)

 

*  The Wisconsin Pain Initiative interviewed executives of managed care companies in the state and found that none of the six “had systematically tracked data or had processes in place to allow them to track, analyze or trend data specific to pain management.”  The study also revealed “ a need for health insurers to assess the cost effectiveness of various approaches to pain management.”   See the AACPI website, www.aacip.wisc.edu, for more information.  (American Alliance of Cancer Pain Initiatives Website; Wisconsin Medical Journal, 2006;105(4):29-31)

 

 

 

OTHER NOTES

 

*  Ohio’s Newark Advocate says that end-of-life care has gone from a “grassroots not-for-profit effort” to “a new source of revenue.”  The author suggests that persons looking for hospice care choose hospices that have physicians who make house calls, frequent nurse visits, home health aides who assist with personal care, caretaker education, volunteers, inpatient acute and respite care, children’s services, social workers and chaplains, bereavement services both before and after death, and services regardless of ability to pay.  (Newark Advocate, 9/21)

 

*  Once the reality of a loved one’s death has set in, most people, including children, “move into a stage of mourning,” the Delaware News Journal says.  The author notes that age is important in how children grieve.  Those considering taking a child to a funeral should let the child know what to expect, answer any questions before or after the event, let the child sit with a calm adult during the service or let the child create a picture or note to place in the casket.  If the child chooses not to attend, let the child honor the lost loved one by lighting a candle, saying a prayer or looking through pictures and talking about the person.  (Delaware News-Journal, 9/25)

 

*  Several new initiatives are designed to protect senior citizens from abuse.  California’s Orange County has an Elder Abuse Forensic Center which investigates allegations of abuse of senior citizens.  Baylor College of Medicine geriatricians review autopsy reports from the county morgue looking for possible abuse.  Wachovia bank tellers are being trained to “detect irregular transactions in the accounts of elderly customers.”  Congress will also consider the Elder Justice Act of 2006, which would create a national database of elder abuse and assign a federal official to coordinate public projects and offer technical assistance.  (The New York Times, 9/27)

 

*  The health of caregivers is in “a downward spiral” says a new study by the National Alliance for Caregiving.  Ninety-one percent of the caregivers surveyed said they were depressed, and 72% said they had not seen their own physician as often as they should since they became caregivers.  One caregiver said, “You know you have to be strong for yourself, but you don’t have the time and the chance.”  See more at www.caregiving.org.  (National Alliance for Caregiving Website; USA Today, 9/25)

 

*  A “detailed study of 1,189 remarkably healthy 70-something men and women” has found that certain combinations of lab tests were good predictors of death.  Twelve years after the original study, which was on successful aging, about half the sample was dead.  Studies of the lab tests performed when they entered the study found “trees” of death.  One “tree” combination of high adrenal hormone levels and high C-reactive protein levels showed 28 deaths among the 30 people in that “tree.”  Most combinations which were good predictors of death included “markers of immune activation” and high levels of stress hormones.  (WebMD with AOL Health, 9/18)

 

Glatfelter Insurance Group is the national sponsor of Hospice News Network for 2006.  Glatfelter Insurance Group provides property and liability insurance for hospices and home healthcare agencies through their Hospice and Community Care Insurance Services division.  Ask your insurance agent to visit their website at www.hccis.com.