The Hospice e-News

What the Media Said about End-of-Life Care This Week

Week of July 18, 2006

…a service of Florida Hospices and Palliative Care

 


 

EXPERTS SAY PARADIGMS OF END-OF-LIFE CARE SHOULD SHIFT

 

One of the big challenges identified by the survey of 35 experts reported in the last issue of State Initiatives in End-of-Life Care (see HNN, 7/11) was the need to shift the reform paradigms.  Historically, the publication notes, reforms in end-of-life care “have been focused on the quest for legal rights and advances in professional education and clinical treatment for mainstream populations.”  Experts in the field now urge attention to other matters such as addressing spiritual and cultural matters, increasing public engagement and addressing discrimination and diversity.

 

Changing the current paradigms will require new approaches, the article says.  In addressing spiritual and cultural matters, Gwendolyn London, DMin, former executive director of the DC Partnership to Improve End-of-Life Care, says, “We must realize that dying is a spiritual process with medical implications, not a medical process with spiritual implications.”  Dr. Richard Payne, director of the Duke Institute on Care at the End of Life, says, “The real challenge for the near-term is to find effective ways to teach practitioners to use nonpharmacological treatments – psychological, psychosocial, and spiritual interventions – and provide ways to integrate them into medical approaches.”  Payne would like to see structured training and “cross-talk” between clergy and clinicians.

 

Dr. Ira Byock, director of palliative medicine at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, says, “Faith communities can teach Americans healthy ways of dying.  We’ve only been shown what not to do:  die in hospitals.  We need community-based discussions of what a good death is in our culture.”

 

Another issue that needs emphasis, the experts say, is greater public engagement.  Dr. Joanne Lynn says, “We really need people to be more activist and supportive of activism.  We need to advocate for good standards, coherent funding, and … taking the message public.  We need a more robust policy agenda and more groups engaged…”

 

Byock agrees and wants to see mobilization of communities to provide supportive care.  “There are not enough professional resources on anybody’s spreadsheet to meet baby boomers’ needs, so it is in our enlightened self-interest to build models of caring in the community:  intergenerational programs, programs operating out of churches, schools and workplaces that share responsibility with the health care system.” 

 

Greater public dialogue on hot issues, the experts agree, is also needed.  The article says that the Terri Schiavo issue pointed out that the “once widely accepted legal framework governing end-of-life was under serious attack and that many Americans lacked the basic information needed to separate fact from demagoguery regarding ‘persistent vegetative states,’ the legal right of surrogates, and the nature of hospice care.”  Many experts also saw the Schiavo controversy as an effort by the “religious right” and vitalists to “create a specious link between abortion and the legal right to withhold life-sustaining treatment.  Maryland’s assistant Attorney General, Jack Schwartz, says, “From a policy perspective, the most important issue is to prevent reform from becoming another front in the abortion wars.”  To prevent this, Schwartz calls for “honest, sensible, humane conversation.”

 

The third paradigm requiring change is that of discrimination and diversity.  The experts say that “attention to the needs of groups of color is just beginning.”  Diane Lewis, coordinator for policy at the National Resource Center on Diversity in End-of-Life Care, says, “It’s not just about training health care providers to be sensitive to differences; it’s more about understanding how people of color are impacted by the health care and social systems generally, and how that affects end-of-life care.”  Lewis says that there has been neither time nor resources to “put together a comprehensive strategy for change.”  But, she says, “We are beginning to have hospice that looks like diverse communities.  Developing such institutions is important.” 

 

This article is one of a series from the recent last State Initiatives in End-of-Life Care issue.  (State Initiatives in End-of-Life Care, 5/2006)

 

 

MAKING PAIN MORE BEARABLE AT THE END OF LIFE

 

Researchers at the University of Washington and Bastyr University are conducting a study that compares “the effectiveness of massage, guided meditation and visits from volunteers for soothing the dying and improving quality of life at the end of life.”  The CAM (Complementary and Alternative Medicine) Comfort Care Study began in 2003 and hopes to begin reporting data next year.  According to its website, Bastyr University “is one of the world’s leading academic centers for advancing knowledge in the natural health sciences.”

 

Most of the 150 currently enrolled patients have been referred from Seattle-area hospices and researchers hope to enroll 300 patients before ending recruitment next summer.  Participants receive random assignments to receive “either massage, meditation or so-called friendly visits, and are interviewed frequently about their physical and emotional well-being, including questions about intellectual ability, if they feel at peace with themselves and their fear of death.” 

 

According to the article, a recent study found that 86% of Washington’s hospice organizations offer complementary care such as massage, music or art therapy and meditation.  But such volunteer-provided therapy “can be sporadic or infrequent,” one of the study researchers says.  If this more rigorous study finds that mediation and massage are more effective than “a simple visit,” the researchers hope that insurance companies “will be more inclined to pay for them.”

 

Sue Ries, Group Health Cooperative hospice administrator, says, “We have lots of anecdotal (information) that says our patients do better and find relief from a variety of comfort measures, but it’s not as good as reliable studies.”  Two respondents featured in the article agree that the measures do offer relief.  Kay Faulkner’s half-hour massages are “about an hour and a half too short.”  Meditation helps 84-year-old Doris Jean Powers plan for her own death.  In a recent study-sponsored session, she visualized herself being carried to her grave with her grandsons as pallbearers.  “The bottom fell out of my casket,” Powers said.  “The look on their faces, I wish I was an artist.  It was hilarious.”

 

The study includes hospice patients with no cognitive impairments and non-hospice patients with advanced cancer or AIDS.  (The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7/8; Bastyr University Website)

 

 

EMPLOYER’S COSTS FOR ELDER CAREGIVING ARE RISING

 

A recent study from the MetLife Mature Market Institute reports that the lost productivity of caregiving employees is $33.6 billion per year.  An employer’s cost for an average caregiver is $2,110 per year and, for caregivers providing “the most intense levels of care,” $2,441.  Employers’ costs have risen 16% since a similar study was conducted in 1997.

 

          Other findings of the study include:

          *  The cost to replace the employees who stop working altogether (184,000 women, 200,000 men) is $6.6 billion.

          *  Partial absenteeism costs employers nearly $2 billion, while full-day absenteeism costs $5 billion.

          *  Interruptions to the workday of at least one hour per week per caregiver cost $6.3 billion.

          *  Sixty percent of working caregivers have had a crisis that required attention during a workday, and cost employers $3.8 billion.

*  Additional lost productivity items include $1.8 billion in costs for supervision, $3.4 billion for unpaid leave costs, and $4.8 billion resulting when employees move from full-time to part-time status.

 

Sandra Timmerman, EdD, director of the MetLife Mature Market Institute, says, “Working caregivers who juggle work and caregiving responsibilities make many workplace adjustments, such as coming in late or leaving early, reducing their work schedules or dropping out of the workforce entirely.  Employer costs related to caregiving are often hidden ones and can be significant.  To stem the losses, employers should consider implementing eldercare programs for employees with a focus on individualized care planning and flexible work arrangements.  It also helps when managers and supervisors are sensitive to caregivers’ needs; that sensitivity often leads to increased worker productivity.”

 

Employers can use a workplace productivity calculator to estimate the lost productivity to their businesses by visiting www.eldercarecalculator.org.  The calculator needs to know the size of the business, the average hourly wage of the employees, and the number of employees who are caregivers in order to calculate the lost productivity cost.

 

The report, which includes a list of low-cost resources to help employers establish flexibility for employees, can be downloaded from the National Alliance for Caregiving website at www.caregiving.org.  (National Alliance for Caregiving Website; The Wall Street Journal, 7/12)

 

 

PAIN AND PALLIATIVE CARE NOTES

 

*  The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) and the International Association for Palliative Care (IAHPC) have recently created a strategy to “develop and promote a global palliative care research initiative, with a special focus on developing countries.”  At a recent meeting, the group adopted The Declaration of Venice to support that goal.  To sign the declaration, see www.eapcnet.org/latestnews/VeniceDeclaration.html.  (EAPC Website)

 

*  An opinion column in New York’s Westchester County The Journal News called on Governor George Pataki (R) to sign a palliative care bill recently passed by the legislature.  The bill establishes a state palliative council, authorizes $4.5 million annually for medical school grants and the establishment of centers of palliative excellence and requires a report, by 2009, from the health commissioner to the governor and legislature on the status and efficacy of pain management in the state.  (The Journal News, 7/11)

 

*  By a vote of 4-2, the San Francisco Planning Commission denied a permit for a storefront which would have allowed Green Cross, one of San Francisco’s cannabis clubs authorized to dispense medical marijuana, to open a location at Fisherman’s Wharf.  Green Cross plans to appeal, despite strong opposition from residents and merchants.  The commission president, denying that tourism was the only issue involved, said, “It wasn’t an appropriate location.  There are several youth facilities nearby.”  (The New York Times, 7/16)

 

 

OTHER NOTES

 

*  Bill Colby, author of Unplugged:  Reclaiming Our Right to Die in America, was featured on C-Span’s Book TV.  As part of Caring Connections’ “It’s About How You LIVE” campaign, Colby has recently been traveling across the US speaking to groups about end-of-life care planning.  (NHPCO E-mail, 7/14)

 

*  The Atlantic Philanthropies and HHS recently announced a $15 million initiative designed to “improve the health and quality of life for older Americans at the local level.”  Working through the National Council on Aging’s Center for Healthy Aging, the moneys will fund mobilization of public/private collaborations which “support the delivery of evidence-based programs for seniors at the community level.”  (Philanthropy News Digest Press Release, 7/12)

 

*  The Boston Globe recently printed an article on Africa’s “angels of death,” as hospice workers were formerly called there.  One hospice worker says, “We’re keeping patients alive now.”  With patients now having access to retroviral drugs, “the world of hospice caregivers … has been upended in a welcome, but also challenging way.”  Hospice workers once referred almost all AIDS patients to hospitals, where they usually lived only a few days.  Now, most work is done in patients’ homes.  Sub-Saharan Africa has one hospice for every five million people, compared to one for every 82,000 in the US.  (The Boston Globe, 7/10)

         

*  “Odyssey Health Care Inc., the second largest provider of hospice care in the United States, will pay the federal government $12.9 million to settle claims of Medicare overbilling, according to the U.S. attorney's office in Milwaukee”  A woman fired by Odyssey Health Care Inc. after questioning Medicare billings by the company will get $2.3 million in the settlement.  See http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=466917 for the full article. (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, 7/13)

 

Thanks to Don Pendley and Anne Koepsell for contributions.

 

Glatfelter Insurance Group is the national sponsor of Hospice News Network for 2006.  Glatfelter Insurance Group provides property and liability insurance for hospices and home healthcare agencies through their Hospice and Community Care Insurance Services division.  Ask your insurance agent to visit their website at www.hccis.com.