The Hospice e-News

What the Media Said about End-of-Life Care This Week

Week of May 15, 2006

…a service of Florida Hospices and Palliative Care

 


 

PHYSICIANS LEARN TO DEAL WITH PEDIATRIC DEATH AND DYING

 

As part of an increasingly widespread initiative to better the care that children with serious medical conditions are receiving throughout the nation, many hospitals and educational programs for physicians are implementing programs to promote “relational care” capacity of those in the medical field.  An article in the Wall Street Journal details the use of tutorials specializing in the personalized care of families dealing with the loss or potential loss of a child.  Such programs are becoming more and more prevalent throughout the country.  The primary goal of these programs is to help physicians and other healthcare professionals feel more comfortable with dealing with families suffering an enormous loss.         

 

There are few situations as devastating to a family as the loss or potential loss of a child, but, the article reports, the latest investigations indicate that the experience and preparedness of many of those in the healthcare profession are significantly lacking.  Physicians desire to be sensitive to the needs of those in their care but do not want the immense emotional strain of becoming deeply emotionally affected by each tragic event that they encounter in their work.  Unfortunately, this often leads to doctors not feeling able to undertake the most difficult conversations with their patients and, when they do so, carrying them out unsatisfactorily – often contributing to long-term emotional damage for the families they serve.

 

To help healthcare professionals become more sensitive, many organizations are now beginning to provide their staff with specialized training.  These trainings include the use of actors playing the part of families and children who find themselves with bleak hopes for recovery.  This provides professionals the chance to practice delivering devastating news to the most vulnerable patients.  One scenario, for example, involves a teenage girl who is informed that her leukemia has returned and that she does not have much time left.  Another scenario involves a family that needs to be informed that their five year old son has been left brain-dead in a drowning accident.  The goal in all of this is to prepare physicians to provide sensitive care in the worst of circumstances.

 

One organization, the Education Development Center, Inc., a nonprofit based in Massachusetts, is using this program in its nationwide Initiative for Pediatric Palliative Care (IPPC).  IPPC works with children’s hospitals and pediatric professional associations to facilitate better treatment and interactions with the families of the tens of thousands of children who die in hospitals in the United States every year, as well as the thousands of others who live with conditions that threaten to kill them.  IPPC director David Browning says, “While tutorials offer no single ‘right’ way to deal with families, there are specific guidelines, such as asking what the family knows and understands, speaking slowly and without using medical jargon, turning off beepers…”  In the past year, around 100 hospitals, pediatric hospices and other organizations have taken part in trainings.

 

Researchers at New York Presbyterian Hospital recently found that pediatric residents of all levels of experience and training are often left feeling unprepared when confronted with the terminally ill patients in their care and informing children and their families of the severity of the child’s condition.  Indeed, studies have shown doctors to be generally reticent about using the words “dying” or “dead” and this is especially true in the case of children and adolescents.  Jargonized terms, such as “terminal” or “critical,” can often yield negative reactions on the part of families.  (The Wall Street Journal, 5/3)

 

 

POLICY NOTES

 

*  NHPCO is currently monitoring S. 1955, “The Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act,” sponsored by Senator Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming).  This bill is an effort to make health insurance benefits more affordable to small businesses.  One of the effects of this bill, however, would be to eliminate state insurance mandate for chiropractic services, mental health services, diabetes and hospice coverage.  NHPCO notes that the bill does not impact Medicare Hospice Benefits.  States that currently have mandated hospice coverage include Arizona, California, Colorado, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New York, Virginia, and Washington.  To view the text of the bill online, visit thomas.loc.gov, enter “S. 1955” (without the quotes) in the Search box, and click the Search button.  (NHPCO Public Policy Alert, 5/3)

 

*  The Florida Senate passed a bill which, if signed by Gov. Jeb Bush, will allow for-profit hospice organizations to compete with non-profits for Florida’s Medicare and Medicaid funds.  The bill, HB 1417, sailed through the Florida Senate, opposed by only 28 of the body’s 160 members.  State Senator Nancy Argenziano criticized her colleagues and says that the bill will allow for-profit corporations to exploit the dying and put in danger the long-term viability of non-profit organizations.  Senate sponsor Jeff Atwater claimed that the bill would provide more options for families, open the door for competition and force non-profits to give the best care possible.  Other speakers and committees had testified that the quality of care had not decreased when for-profits began operations in 49 other states.  The bill, said Atwater, would put non-profits “on notice that the best in the business” are on their way to Florida.  A similar bill did not get passed by legislators last year, following a campaign by the state’s non-profit hospices to prevent its passage.  (Citrus Times, 4/29; Palm Beach Post, 4/28)

 

 

BOOK NOTES

 

*  Why People Die by Suicide, a recently released book by Thomas Joiner, explores the factors that increase facility of suicide.  Joiner, says a JAMA reviewer, draws on hundreds of academic sources, his clinical experience and his own father’s suicide.  The book includes both a theory of suicidal genesis and clinical prevention strategies.  Joiner notes that successive self-injury is a regular precursor among those who go on to fatal suicide, hypothesizing that such self-inflicted damage reduces the individual’s fear of bodily injury, thereby removing one of the key resistances to suicide.  The lack of a sense of belonging and of connection to others, he notes, is a primary motivator of suicide.  Age is also a critical factor, he observes; and suicide incidence increases with age and becomes most common among those 65 or older.  Joiner discusses prevention and intervention, detailing interpersonal psychotherapy, which aims to help the suicidal patient with one issue that causes him or her great distress.  The goal is to help the patient find relief on this one issue in the hopes that this success could have positive resonance throughout the patient’s life.  Joiner also describes cognitive behavioral analysis, as well as his own therapeutic approach, which targets the patient’s perceived burdensomeness and lack of belonging.  (JAMA, 2006; 295:2082-2083)

 

*  In Patient Autonomy and the Ethics of Responsibility, physician Alfred I. Tauber primarily blames physicians themselves for submitting to economic and organizational influences and allowing a culture that promotes a legal-contract model of the patient–physician relationship.  “Law appears when trust fails,” he notes.  Tauber seeks to correct the way law has come to overemphasize the right of the patient to determine the course of treatment, often at the expense of the patient’s need for compassionate treatment from his or her physician.  Tauber details a strategy, says a NEJM review, to include greater sensitivity to moral values, increased ethics education and the creation, by institutional providers, of an ethical component to be included in the personal record of every patient.  (NEJM, 2006;354:1966-1967)

 

*  Death’s Door – Modern Dying and the Ways We Grieve:  A Cultural Study is written by Sandra Gilbert, a professor of English at the University of California, Davis.  Inspired in large part by the death of her husband, says a JAMA reviewer, Gilbert relives her own experience of loss and American society’s meticulous evasion of an acknowledgement of death.  Gilbert recalls the words of a surgeon who attended her dying husband.  “I arrived when he was just terminating,” said the surgeon.  “I arrived before he terminated, but he had not responded at that time.”  Gilbert remarks upon our society as one that, having witnessed the massive scenes of death of the 20th century, has become a culture in which death is administered, timed and orchestrated.  She cautions against the effect of medical technology as a distancing agent between doctor and patient.  Gilbert’s book, says the JAMA reviewer, invites the reader to confront the reality of death and to deal with it honestly and humanly.  (JAMA, 2006;295:2079-2080)

 

 

RESEARCH NOTES

 

*  Chronic pain is a problem for both workers and their employers, says Florida State University associate professor Wayne Hochwarter.  Hochwarter says that research shows that chronic pain – lasting for at least six months – affects as many as 50 million Americans and most of them are full-time workers.  Apart from the effect upon the individuals themselves, there is an enormous economic impact upon their employers, who lose thousands of dollars in productivity each year as a result.  Social stigmas and fears of losing employment may hide the true extent of the problem.  One study found that chronic pain cost employers more than $5,000 per employee per year.  Adding indirect costs could triple that amount.  (Law and Health Weekly, 5/6)

 

*  A study of healthcare preferences and changes in preferences in older adults reveals that “the acceptability of treatment resulting in certain diminished states of health increases with time.”  As health declines, persons may become more willing to accept what others see as a poor quality of life, because they do not perceive it as such.  The study was conducted via in-home interviews with 226 elderly, community-dwelling persons with advanced cancer, congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.  The interviews were conducted at least every four months for up to two years.  Patients rated whether treatment for their illness would be acceptable if it resulted in 1 of 4 health states.  These changes in health care preferences, say the study’s authors, pose a challenge to advance care planning.  (Archives of Internal Medicine, 2006;166(8):890-895)

 

*  A new study indicates that most physicians are willing to discuss religion with patients, but only half actually initiate such conversations.  The survey, which was carried out by researchers at the University of Chicago, suggests that it is unlikely that a doctor will recommend prayer and highly unlikely that he or she will pray with the patient.  Farr Curlin, the author of the study, found that there was “no consensus among physicians about what is customary or appropriate” and that the approach of each individual doctor is likely to vary greatly.  More than 90% of those who responded to the study (1,140 of the 2,000 contacted) said it was appropriate to discuss religious or spiritual issues when a patient brings them up.  Only half said that they inquire, occasionally or more often, about a patient’s faith.  Only 10% said that they routinely mentioned their own faith, and fewer than one in three endorsed praying with patients.  The study found that physicians’ personal religious convictions tend to guide their responses.  While 76% of religious doctors inquire as to their patients’ beliefs, only 23% of minimally religious physicians do.  Protestant doctors were the most likely to discuss such matters and to pray with patients.  (Livescience Website, 5/1)

 

 

OTHER NOTES

 

*  MayoClinic.com provides public education that stresses the importance of preparing for emergencies by gathering important medical information about loved ones.  There are a number of things that one should know about the health of one’s aged parents or others who are at risk for medical emergencies, says the site.  In order to help doctors in providing care, the site suggests that information be readily available, including the names of the person’s doctors, the person’s birth date, a list of allergies, major medical problems, a list of medications, religious beliefs (for example, in the case of blood transfusions), insurance information, prior surgery and lifestyle information – such as whether the person smokes or uses alcohol.  The site also suggests that patients and families complete advance directives.

(MayoClinic Website, 5/5)

 

*  The Broadway production, “’Night Mother,” portrays a family dealing with the impending loss of one of its members and their interaction with hospice.  The production, with Mia Farrow playing the lead, is interspersed with dark humor and addresses how children react to their parents’ end-of-life concerns.  (New York Magazine, 5/2)

 

*  Dr. Joseph Civetta, in the inaugural lecture of the Rowe Lecture Series at the University of Connecticut, highlighted issues in end-of-life care.  Civetta, a surgeon who has written extensively and taught at Harvard Medical School and the University of Miami School of Medicine, told participants that we live in a society that has a “problem facing both life and death.”  Civetta criticized a pervading culture that views death as “unnatural” and “a failure,” and argued that, “We should not be preventing death, but we should be preventing bad dying.”  Civetta focused on the meaning of a “good death,” suggesting that it is one that is focused above all upon the needs of the patient, not upon those of the family or health insurance companies.  He called on his audience to become familiar with right-to-die cases and to consider futile vs. worthwhile care, as well as what constitutes “quality of life.” Civetta encouraged caregivers to spend as much time developing good relationships with their patients as they do mastering new technology.  Despite all recent medical advances, Civetta noted, “The death rate remains the same:  one per person.”  (Advance, 4/17)

 

 

FAMILY CAREGIVER ALLIANCE URGES IMPROVED CAREGIVER ASSESSMENT

 

A two-part report issued this week, by the National Center on Caregiving at the Family Caregiver Alliance (FCA),“calls for significant improvement in healthcare and long-term care that relies too much on families without recognizing and assessing family caregivers’ own support and health needs.”  “Caregiver assessment,” the report says, “is an essential component of comprehensive care for frail elders and adults with chronic or disabling conditions, particularly dementia.”  A communication from NHPCO notes that the report specifically “references hospice as a model of family caregiver assessment.” 

 

Volume I, Caregiver Assessment:  Principles, Guidelines and Strategies, contains an overview, a brief section on the background and significance of the report, principles and guidelines for practice and strategies and actions for change.  This volume “reflects the professional consensus achieved among nationally recognized experts and stakeholders on fundamental principles and practice guidelines that apply to a range of practitioners in a variety of settings.”  The strategies in the report, which were developed at a National Consensus Development Conference are geared to supporting caregiver assessment “as a basic component of service.”  Volume II, Caregiver Assessment:  Voices and Views from the Field, contains background papers and personal accounts.  Both volumes can be downloaded from www.caregiver.org.

 

The overview to the report says that, in spite of years of research showing that family caregivers are under tremendous stress and in dire need of support, “A major gap exists between research and practice…  Few federal and state home and community-based services (HCBS) programs uniformly assess the family caregiver’s well-being and needs for support.”  One important way to address the research/practice gap is the “development and dissemination of consensus guidelines.” 

 

            Data to support the position of the authors includes the following facts:

            *  Eighty percent of the nearly 10 million Americans who need long term care live at home or in community settings rather than in nursing homes.

            *  Seventy-eight percent of those getting care at home get no care from paid caregivers.  Friends and family, particularly wives and adult daughters, provide the care exclusively.

            *  Fourteen percent of long-term care recipients get a combination of paid and unpaid care, with only eight percent cared for exclusively by formal care.

            *  Estimates are that 44 million adults provide unpaid care to seniors and adults with disabilities in their communities. 

            *  The economic value of unpaid caregiving is estimated at $257 billion per year, dwarfing the costs of nursing home care ($92 billion) and home healthcare ($32 billion).

            *  Family members are being asked to carry out roles formerly assumed by healthcare providers, “with little or no preparation, training or support.”

            *  The policy direction to shift from institutional toward more home and community care … depends greatly upon family caregiving.”

 

The guidelines call for assessment of all family caregivers who come into contact with health and social services.  The report recommends domains for assessment, such as caregiver values and preferences and the caregiver’s well-being, with several points of evaluation within each domain.  Assessments should be done initially and as new challenges and changes in the caregiving situation arise.  They should be triggered by any indication from health professionals, family, friends or the caregivers themselves that they have become or will become a caregiver.

 

Some caregivers may object to the term “assessment,” and see it as a test of competency.  The authors suggest using the word “interview” instead.  The discussion should always be framed in the context of offering to provide help and assessors should be trained in caregiver assessment.

 

The conference attendees recommended that, in the next one to three years, support should be built for family caregivers, demonstration projects should be developed, assessors should be trained, caregiver support and assessment should be incorporated in Medicaid and home and community-based services and family caregiver assessment should be incorporated as a category of service under the National Family Caregiver Support Program (NFCSP).

 

Within four to six years, the recommendations include adopting caregiver policies at CMS, developing professional education and training programs on caregiver assessment, changing record-keeping and information systems to include data on caregiving and developing a uniform data set of caregiving issues.

 

In conclusion, the authors say, “The adoption of these principles and guidelines, embracing a family-centered perspective, will require a fundamental change of thinking in policy and practice.  It is hoped that the wide dissemination of this consensus report will encourage the implementation of these caregiver assessment principles and guidelines and the adoption of these recommended change strategies within and across care settings to improve the lives of America’s caregiving families.”  (National Center on Caregiving Website; NHPCO NewsBriefs, 5/11)

 

 

IMAGING ALLOWS PATIENTS TO WATCH PAIN IN THE BRAIN

 

In “My Pain, My Brain,” in the May 14 issue of The New York Times, writer Melanie Thernstrom explores the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that allows patients to view pain in their brains and attempt to change it.  A Stanford University study asked volunteers to “try to increase and decrease their pain while watching the activation of a part of their brain involved in pain perception and modulation.”  As they watch the real-time images, they can see how well they are succeeding.

 

Thernstrom reports that FMRI, with new software, is taking moving pictures of activity in the brain.  Researchers are attempting to “read” the movies – to understand what is happening in the brain as a person experiences, or changes the experience of, pain.  The brain’s pain network involves several areas of the brain, perhaps as many as 10, transmitting information back and forth.  The two pain systems, perception and modulation, have their own distinct structures and also have some that overlap.  The pain modulation system inhibits the activity of the pain perception systems.  Chronic pain may involve either an overactive pain-perception system or a poorly functioning pain-modulation one.

 

The pain modulation system can be activated by stress and, in certain circumstances, can completely block out any perception of pain.  Pain modulation is also affected by belief.  The placebo effect happens when the brain shuts down pain when it thinks pain medication has been given, even if it has not.  The opposite effect, nocebo, will augment pain even if one is not being hurt.  Some studies have shown that pain medications, even opiates, achieve part of their effect by placebo.  When pain subjects are given opiates, such as morphine, they work much better if the patients are told that they’ve been given a strong pain reliever. 

 

Functional magnetic resonance imaging scans the rostral anterior cingulated cortex (rACC), which “plays a critical role in the awareness of the nastiness of pain.”  Pain, Thernstrom reports, is a perception – a sensation may be felt as pressure or temperature, but when it exceeds a certain threshold, the rACC is activated and the sensation changes to pain.

 

Neuroimaging therapy (sessions in the fMRI machine in which the patient attempts to learn to modulate pain) has been shown to be effective.  One group of chronic pain subjects reported a 64% decrease in pain at the end of the study.  But one concern of the researchers was whether they were creating “the world’s most expensive placebo.”  Control groups, using only pain-reduction techniques or scanning without the patient viewing the images, had little or no success in modulating pain.

 

The second phase of the Stanford study, now underway, will assess the long-term practical benefits of neuroimaging therapy.  Patients will receive six sessions teaching them to regulate pain and will be followed for six months to see if “they can fundamentally change their modulation system so that it can reduce pain all the time without constantly and consciously thinking about it.” 

 

Neurophysiologist Christopher deCharms, a principle investigator of the study, says that the lessons may cause lasting change because “the brain is a machine designed to learn.”  The brain is soft-wired rather than hard-wired, so when something is learned, new nerve connections are formed and older unused ones wither away.  Neuroimaging may someday offer advantages over drug therapies.  The receptors targeted by drugs usually occur in multiple systems throughout the brain, which is one reason why drugs usually have side-effects.  But neuroimaging therapy attempts to teach control of one local brain region.

 

Thernstrom muses about whether neuroimaging may someday be used “as a vehicle for self-transparency” – whether she could use it to read her own mind.  Dr. Scott Fishman, chief of pain medicine at the University of California, Davis, doesn’t think so.  “I’m not sure that functional imaging is actually looking at the mind,” he said.  “The mind is like a virtual organ – it doesn’t’ have a physical address that we know about.”  Fishman says that functional imaging is a 2-D snapshot of a 3-D or 4-D event which “shows the level of activation of different parts of the brain, from which we can extrapolate something about the mind.  But what we really need to see is how the parts talk to each other – and the complex nuances of their language.”  (The New York Times, 5/14)

 

 

RESEARCH AND RESOURCE NOTES

 

*  “Attitudes, Values and Questions of African Americans Regarding Participation in Hospice Programs”, in the current Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, reports on the focus groups held in churches with large African American memberships.  “The key findings include a pervasive lack of information about hospice, producing numerous assumptions about hospice services, as well as cultural and institutional barriers.  Misconceptions about hospice included assumptions that the care would be inadequate, people would die lonely, painful deaths and that hospice was inaccessible to African Americans because of cost.  Themes of mistrust and misconceptions permeated the data.  The article may be viewed online at www.medscape.com/viewarticle/530363?src=mp.  (Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 2006;8(2):77-85)

 

*  Understanding the Remittance Advice:  A Guide for Medicare Providers, Physicians, Suppliers, and Billers is available in PDF form on the CMS website at www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNProducts/downloads/RA_Guide_Full_03-22-06.pdf or by searching on “remittance advice,” without the quotes, at www.cms.hhs.gov.  Printed copies may be ordered from the Medicare Learning Network.  (CMS Website)

 

*  Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease in Primary Care,” an article in the current JAMA, reports that patients in collaborative care received more cholinesterase inhibitors and antidepressants, than a control group in augmented usual care.  They also had “significantly fewer behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia” at 12 months and 18 months.  Caregivers for the intervention group also showed improvements in distress and depression.  “No group differences were found on the CCSD, cognition, activities of daily living, or on rates of hospitalization, nursing home placement, or death.”  (JAMA, 2006;295:2148-2157)

 

*  A review of clinical studies, published in The Cochrane Library,  finds that medication is the best pain treatment following surgery, but that music may be a good complement.  Patients listening to music after surgery had reduced needs for opiates and reported less pain than others who did not listen.  The benefits of music in relieving pain may be too small to reduce drug-related side-effects but still may be worth trying, “because it is non-invasive and inexpensive.”  (Medicine & Law Weekly, 5/12)

 

“Integrating Palliative Care for Liver Transplant Candidates,” an article in this week’s JAMA,  says that many patients awaiting liver transplants are “too well for transplant, too sick for life.”  While there have been treatment advances for end-stage liver disease, “patients with ESLD are often beset by wide-ranging and distressing symptoms that markedly decrease their quality of life.  Physicians should aggressively attend to these symptoms in order to maximize the patients’ quality of life.”  (JAMA, 2006;295:2168-2177)

 

 

OTHER NOTES

 

*  EMT’s in Seattle’s King County may now follow a protocol, “Compelling Reasons,” which gives them “the latitude to forgo resuscitation when they judge it to be ‘futile, inappropriate and inhumane,’ even when there is no official paperwork.”  “Compelling Reasons” is the result of the work of two King County paramedics who found the system that required them to resuscitate, sometimes even in the face of written or family wishes, “an affront to patients’ wishes for peaceful death.”  (The Seattle Times, 5/9)

 

*  The current issue of JAMA has a poem on pain written by Sigrun Susan Lane.  The text is online at jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/295/18/2114.  Lane calls pain “the bully in the play yard who waits to follow you home,” and in a later verse, writes, “Like water, she finds weakness, seeps along a fissure to open granite at the core.  She will be your companion.”  (JAMA, 2006;295:2114)

 

 

Glatfelter Insurance Group is the national sponsor of Hospice News Network for 2006.  Glatfelter Insurance Group provides property and liability insurance for hospices and home healthcare agencies through their Hospice and Community Care Insurance Services division.  Ask your insurance agent to visit their website at www.hccis.com.