|
Week of April 11, 2005
…a service of
___________________________________________________________
SENATE
EXAMINES ITS ROLE IN EOL ISSUES
For the first time ever, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee discussed end-of-life issues last week. Rather than focusing on legislative possibilities, committee leaders “sought to highlight the policies and issues that people confront in deciding whether they or their relatives should be kept alive by artificial means when death nears,” The Chicago Tribune reported.
Committee witnesses, all experts in some
medical or social aspect of end-of-life issues, emphasized the lack of planning
on the part of Americans that result in situations like Terri Schiavo’s. J. Donald Schumacher, president and CEO of
NHPCO, testified and said, “Most families spend more
time planning for their annual summer vacation than they do for a health-care
emergency.” Some committee members asked how Congress could deal with the lack of
preparation, and witnesses “cautioned against
legislating anything too quickly and urged them to take the time to educate themselves
thoroughly about end-of-life issues and the medical consequences of various
actions.”
Schumacher encouraged Congress to pass a bill introduced by
Senator Bill Nelson (D-Florida) that would allow Medicare payment for a patient
visit to discuss end-of-life issues with a physician.
One
witness, H. Rutherford Turnbull,
co-director of the
Lawmakers traded jabs at each other over the Senate’s passage of a bill allowing Schiavo’s parents to plead their case in federal court. Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) called the bill’s passage an abuse of power on the part of Republican senators. Senator Richard Burr (R-North Carolina) countered, saying Congress’s action on the bill was “a great day for the House and Senate.”
Representing the
DO DOCTORS SAY
GOODBYE AT EOL? SHOULD THEY?
Those are questions asked by a recent Newsday article, which says, “The answers vary, doctor to doctor, and reflect the personality of the doctor and the chemistry that occurs at the bedside.” But many agree that medical schools rarely teach such answers and writer Jamie Talan says, “Sensitivity to the patient, especially as the potential for healing has been exhausted, is sometimes lost in the corridors of modern medicine.”
Dr. Timothy Quill, professor at the
Dr. Ronald Bash, an oncologist, has been involved with many families of patients, even after death. He’s been to many funerals but says sometimes he found himself getting dressed but never making it to the service. He no longer attends funerals but does call the family right after a death and always sends a condolence card.
Quill says that the hospice movement has “helped show doctors how to say goodbye.” Many doctors, he finds, stop making house or hospice calls when there isn’t a medical need any more. “But often there’s a social need to be filled. A lot of doctors are not comfortable with sadness.”
Dr. Kanti Rai, of Long Island Jewish Medical Center, says he tempers bad news “by taking into account who is on the other side of me. Brutal honesty is something I don’t practice.” But once he’s talked with patients about a bad prognosis, Rai says he “maintains a fighting attitude. That is just as important for patients to see.” He also goes to as many funerals as possible, saying that he would like to think there’s something to be learned from each death.
Dr. Daniel Blazer was an intern when first faced with the death of a patient. One of his patients was dying of cancer, and Blazer grew steadily more uncomfortable entering his room. One day he stuck his head in, and the patient said, “Come in. You really are afraid of being around someone who is dying.” The patient asked Blazer to spend a few minutes with him each day until he died, and Blazer honored the patient’s request. “What I remember,” Blazer says, “is that I didn’t have to say anything. We both knew what was happening. He was just happy that I was there.”
The article also contains a link to the Cancer Facts End-of-Life Care FAQ at NIH. That website has a number of helpful hints, including ways that caregivers can provide emotional support to patients. See cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/8_15.htm. (Newsday, 4/5)
THE SCIENTIST ISSUES
SPECIAL PAIN SUPPLEMENT
The Scientist, a magazine targeted to researchers in the life sciences, has issued a special supplement on pain and the advances in biomedical research into pain. The supplement, which can be found at www.the-scientist.com/supplement/2005-03-28, was made possible by contributions from Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development.
The issue contains many articles and links. Among them are:
* “A Word From Our Sponsor,” which has a PDF titled “Developing Novel Treatments for the Complex Problem of Pain.’”
* “Dealing With Pain” examines how far we have come with pain control and relief during this decade, which was designated by Congress as the Decade of Pain Control and Relief. The article says that the report would be quite positive if this were the decade of pain research and, that though the gap between the research and implementation of new drugs is narrowing, many are still in chronic pain.
* “Gateways to Pathological Pain” is a scholarly article on signal transduction and the immune system.
* “From Nerves to Immunity” looks at an important discovery from a chemotherapy side effect. Children with neuroblastoma received an experimental antibody treatment, which got rid of their tumors but left them in intense neuropathic pain. Investigation found that it was not due to nerve damage but to the presence of tumor necrosis factor.
* “Pain Hypersensitivity and Morphine Tolerance” examines shared mechanisms between the two. Chronic morphine treatment activates spinal microglia and increases proinflammatory cytokines. Cytokine inhibitors can restore the effectiveness of morphine.
* A section called “The Essence of Pain” gives a timeline of analgesia and anesthesia, tells the story of a child with a congenital insensitivity to pain and discusses the limitations of animal models of pain;
* “The Interpreter” is an article on brain imaging as it relates to the experience of pain. Using PET scans, researchers find brain areas correlating to the experience of acute pain, but chronic pain has been more of a challenge.
* “The Quest for Pain Relief” examines the history of pain medications. The “gallery” of pain medication labels is from a history of pain collection. Other articles in the section are on research on pain medication from sea snails, the role of nicotine, marijuana and tricyclic antidepressants in treating pain and on gabapentin.
* Other articles examine opiates, the future of Cox-2 studies, research on Cox-3 and research into the perception of pain. (The Scientist, 3/28)
EOL & PAS
NOTES
* Delegates to the Virginia House say that end-of-life issues will be on the agenda for next year’s session. Delegate Robert G. Marshall (R) says, “At a minimum, we need to say that you can’t just starve someone to death if there is no written declaration by the person in question.” (AP, 4/2)
* And A Time to Die: How American Hospitals Shape the End of Life, by Sharon R. Kaufman, and Physician Assisted Dying: The Case for Palliative Care and Patient Choice, by Timothy E. Quill and Margaret P. Battin, are both reviewed in NEJM. Reviewer Dr. James L. Bernat, of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, says that both books make important contributions to answering questions about whether physician-assisted suicide should be legalized, how physicians should integrate “vague” advance directives into clinical care and how “market forces or acculturated behavior determine medical practices at the end of life.” (NEJM, 2005;352:1500-1501)
* Charles
Tiefer, of the University of
* “The Chicken and the Egg: The Pursuit of Choice for a Human Hastened-Death as a Catalyst for Improved End of Life Care,” by Kathryn L. Tucker, originally published last year by the New York University Annual Survey of American Law, is available from the website of Death With Dignity. The lead-in to the article on the website says, “The Oregon experience provides a strong basis to argue that when Death with Dignity is an available option, physicians redouble their efforts to become educated about current pain management practices.” A link to the PDF is available at www.deathwithdignity.org/fss/news/nyu_tucker.asp. (Death With Dignity National Center Website)
* Anne
C. Klein,
* Robert
A. Burt, JD, of
* Mordechai
Halperin, a medical ethicist, speaking in an interview in The Jerusalem Report, says that three conditions are required
before Jewish law allows care to be withheld from a patient: 1) the patient must be terminally ill; 2) the
patient must be suffering terribly; and 3) the patient has said, or it can be
assumed, that life should not be extended.
Halperin also says that Jewish law does not allow, under any
circumstances, withdrawal of oxygen, hydration or nutrition. (The
PAIN &
MEDICAL MARIJUANA NOTES
* A bill
before the
* A
* Researchers
who used to think that the benefits of acupuncture were mostly due to the
“placebo effect” now are not so sure. “A growing body of evidence -- brain scans, ultrasound and other techniques -- shows that acupuncture triggers direct,
measurable effects on the body…” New
research is targeting the mechanism by which acupuncture’s effects are achieved. (Los Angeles Times, 4/4)
OTHER NOTES
* An article from Guidestar, the national database of nonprofit organizations, reports that 46% of respondents to a survey cited finding money as the greatest challenge of their organization. “Other,” which included items such as board-related issues and evaluation, was in second place at 21%. Publicizing the organization’s mission and activities was rated as the third highest challenge at 17%. (Guidestar, 4/2005)
* Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., announced “positive top-line results” from the phase III clinical trials of methylnaltrexone, which treats opioid-induced constipation. Laxation occurred within four hours much more often with MNTX than with placebo and the drug was “generally well-tolerated.” (Lab Business Week, 4/10)
* Dr. Robert M. Arnold, co-author of a JAMA article on methods of handling conflict between physicians and families, says that “physicians often assume that conflict is a bad thing and something that should be avoided, yet conflict handled well can be productive and the clarity that results can lead to clearer decision making and greater satisfaction.” The Law & Health Weekly article quotes Arnold, who says, “Dealing with conflict is a critical skill for physicians. Recognizing and dealing with conflict can improve relationships and shed light on complicated clinical situations, and the rewards include a grateful family and a sense of both personal and professional satisfaction.” (Law & Health Weekly, 4/9)